[visionlist] Highly cited publications on vision in which authors were also subjects?
William K. Stell
wstell at ucalgary.ca
Wed May 27 14:13:41 -04 2020
Yes - a HUGE YES - to John Robson, whose paper with Fergus Campbell on contrast sensitivity (1968 JPhysiol, 197:551-566) - "The authors acted as subjects" - is one of my all-time favourites.
Many thanks, John.
“Treat people as if they were what they ought to be, and you will
help them become what they are capable of becoming.”
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
William K. Stell, PhD, MD
Professor, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy
and Department of Surgery
Member, Lions Sight Centre
Member, Hotchkiss Brain Institute (HBI)
Associate Member, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute (ACHRI)
University of Calgary - Cumming School of Medicine
3330 Hospital Dr. NW
Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1
(tel) : 1-403-220-7501
(fax) : 1-403-210-8840
(email): wstell at ucalgary.ca
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: Bev Clair
(office): HMRB 182
(tel) : 1-403-210-6560
(fax) : 1-403-210-8840
(email) : bclair at ucalgary.ca<mailto:bclair at ucalgary.ca>
The views and opinions expressed above are the personal property of the writer and are not to be shared by the addressee without permission. They are also not necessarily those of University of Calgary or the Foundation Fighting Blindness, and they may not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
From: visionlist <visionlist-bounces at visionscience.com> on behalf of Robert Hess, Dr. <robert.hess at mcgill.ca>
Sent: May 27, 2020 10:53 AM
To: gabrieljacobdiaz at gmail.com <gabrieljacobdiaz at gmail.com>; visionlist at visionscience.com <visionlist at visionscience.com>
Subject: Re: [visionlist] Highly cited publications on vision in which authors were also subjects?
I concur with John. In my lab you can’t get away with not being a subject in your own psychophysical experiment, for the simple reason that you need to know what artefacts to control, naive subjects won’t tell you this interesting information. I am a subject in almost all of my normal psychophysics and imaging.
On May 27, 2020, at 11:47 AM, John Robson <jgr11 at cam.ac.uk<mailto:jgr11 at cam.ac.uk>> wrote:
I believe that both Fergus Campbell and I developed quite a reputation for asking authors of drafts of psychophysical papers about the subjective experience of being an experimental subject. We both always felt that the design of experiments should take into account what it was like to be a subject and it was always desirable for authors to be among the subjects. You will find that all the most cited psychophysical papers of both Campbell and myself rely heavily (if not exclusively) on reports of observations made by their authors.
On May 27 2020, Gabriel Diaz wrote:
Dear vision community,
In response to a recent proposal to my IRB, I have received a request to
provide examples of manuscripts in which the PI is also the subject in the
manuscript. I am hoping that some of you may be able to help me track some
down. The more impactful the better, whether that be indicated by citation
count, recognition of the publication venue, or any other metric, as long
as it will be evident to a non-expert.
Extra points if the study involves some element of motor behavior /
perception & action.
Thanks in advance,
Professor John Robson ScD FRS
Senior Research Professor in Vision Science
University of Houston College of Optometry, Houston, TX 77204-2020
+1 (713) 743 1807
Fellow, Gonville & Caius College, Trinity St., Cambridge, CB2 1TA
Herrings House, Wilbraham Rd, Fulbourn, Cambridge, CB21 5EU
+44 1223 880277
jgr11 at cam.ac.uk<mailto:jgr11 at cam.ac.uk>
visionlist mailing list
visionlist at visionscience.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the visionlist