[visionlist] Eurographics 2024 - Call for Papers!
kalo at cs.umass.edu
Tue Aug 1 11:55:04 -04 2023
Call for Full Papers
The EUROGRAPHICS 2024Full Papers Program will showcase innovative
research in Computer Graphics and related areas. We invite submissions
of new ideas and encourage all forms of research creativity and
originality. We are interested in the practice, experience, novel
applications, technological, system, or theoretical papers, with the
ambition of setting the standard in the field and stimulating future trends.
Accepted full papers will be presented at EUROGRAPHICS 2024 and
published in a special issue of the Eurographics journal Computer
Graphics Forum <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678659>; the
submissions will undergo a double-blind two-step review process. We
encourage submissions from all areas related to computer graphics,
including but not limited to rendering, modeling, animation, simulation,
AI / deep learning for graphics, image processing, computational
imaging, computational fabrication, display technology, human-computer
interaction, virtual and augmented reality. Eurographics Full Papers
will be published in the EG Digital Library. Also, Gold Open Access
be available with an extra publication fee that includes open access fee
and support through the EG Digital Library.
Eurographics 2024 will be hosted in Limassol, Cyprus on April 22nd-26th,
At least one author should register and present in-person his or her
paper. Participants of Eurographics 2024 will be able to attend
presentations of latest advances in computer graphics and imaging from
the research and industry experts. It is also going to be a great
opportunity to meet with international researchers in the domain and
socialize around the conference social events.
More information on Eurographics 2024 is available at:
All following deadlines are at 23:59 UTC.
Sep. 28, 2023: Preliminary abstract due (required for any further
Oct 5, 2023: Full paper due
Nov. 30, 2023: Reviews released
Dec. 7, 2023: Rebuttal due
Dec. 22, 2023: Notification for conditional acceptance or rejection
Feb. 1, 2024: Revised version due
Feb. 15, 2024: Final notification
Feb. 29, 2024: Camera-ready version
Note that a full paper can only be submitted if an abstract has been
submitted by the abstract deadline.
Electronic submission of all papers is mandatory and will be conducted
using the Submission and Review Management (SRMv2)
<https://srmv2.eg.org/COMFy/Conference/EG_2024>. Papers must be written
in English, must be anonymized, and must be formatted according to the
Eurographics Computer Graphics Forum guidelines. The publication
guidelines and LaTeX templates are available on SRMv2
papers must be presented orally in English at Eurographics 2024. Review
of full papers is based on a double-blind reviewing approach, so please
be sure to remove all personal data (such as authors, affiliations,
etc.) from your submission. References to your own work should be made
in the third person to maintain anonymity. Reviewers are asked to keep
confidential all materials sent to them for evaluation.
There is no maximum length imposed on papers. However, papers should
only be as long as they need to be, but not longer. Reviewers might rank
submissions perceived as being either repetitive or unnecessarily long
lower than they would score concisely written papers.
Authors of accepted papers will present a very short summary or a teaser
during a fast-forward session. This presentation will be around 25
seconds and can be augmented by slides. To ensure a smooth organization,
they will be asked to prepare a short video of the slides for this
purpose, in two versions: one with the spoken text and one without.
Details will be sent to accepted paper authors.
A submission to the Eurographics Full Papers program should describe the
original work of the authors. Authors must not use ideas or content
originating from others without properly crediting their original
sources. Note that such sources are not limited to peer-reviewed
publications but also include patents, textbooks, technical reports,
theses, unpublished work posted on arXiv, and other posts on the World
Wide Web. Failure to comply with this requirement will be considered
plagiarism and result in rejection.
Authors are expected to cite, discuss differences and novelty, and
compare results, if applicable, with respect to relevant existing
publications, provided they have been published in a peer-reviewed
venue. This also applies to patents, which also undergo a professional
reviewing process. But what about technical reports, and other
non-peer-reviewed publications, such as technical reports or papers
posted on arXiv, which we henceforth refer to as pre-publications? With
the rapid progress of search engines and the increased perusal of arXiv
papers by the scientific community, asking authors to thoroughly compare
their work to these pre-publications imposes an unreasonable burden — a
seemingly relevant report that is incomplete in its disclosure or
validation might appear online shortly before the deadline. Although
peer-reviewed publications are certainly not immune to these
shortcomings, they have, at least, been judged sufficiently complete and
valid by a group of peers. Consequently, authors are not required to
discuss and compare their work with recent prepublications (arXiv,
technical reports, theses, etc.), although they must properly cite those
that inspired them (see “Plagiarism” above). Nevertheless, we encourage
authors to mention all related works they are aware of as good academic
practice dictates. Note that with new works posted on arXiv on a daily
basis, it is increasingly likely that reviewers might point out
similarities between the submitted work and online reports that have
been missed by the authors. In this case, authors of conditionally
accepted papers should be prepared to cite these pre-publications in
their final revision as concurrent work, without the burden of having to
detail how their work compares to or differs from these
pre-publications. When authors cite previous work that they have
authored, the citation should be in the third person to preserve
anonymity. There are, however, situations where such prior work should
not be cited. This is the case if these prior works correspond to
prepublications of the submission (arXiv), with largely similar content.
In this case, it must be ensured that no publicity related to the
publication is available on the web.
As authors, putting a submission on a repository like arXiv is allowed,
either before submission or during the review cycle. There is no penalty
for publishing a submission as a prepublication. However, if there are
largely overlapping prepublications of the same authors that are
available online at the time of submission (arXiv), earlier or largely
similar versions of the submission should not be cited in the submission
because this would identify the authors. This is consistent with the
submission guidelines at SIGGRAPH and CVPR/ECCV/ICCV. After submission,
the authors should try to preserve the anonymity of the submission.
Specifically, the following list clarifies what is allowed and what not.
arXiv postings before and after the submission deadline. Do not
state that the submission is under review for Eurographics.
YouTube video on personal account. Do not show submission id or
anything that could relate to as a Eurographics submission. Authors
can link the videos from the arXiv page or personal web page.
Code release on personal code repositories (e.g., github). Authors
can link the code repository from the arXiv or personal web page.
It is ok to list submissions in job applications and in interviews
as long as they are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.
It is ok to present the work in non-public venues in particular job
talks as long as they are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.
It is ok to list submissions on author’s webpages as long as they
are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.
It is ok to publicize the work via authors’ social media as long as
they are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.
It is not allowed to list submissions on institutional websites
irrespective of the presentation form.
No publicity via university or company PR teams regardless of
whether authors or institutions are kept anonymous – this includes
any postings or dissemination via institutional or promoted social
No media interviews regardless of mainstream media or tech-focused
outlets (small-scale, non-public seminars are allowed).
Do not post papers or supplementary material on university, company,
or other private servers that may identify preprints as Eurographics
Double Submission Policy
By submitting a manuscript to the Eurographics Full Papers program,
authors acknowledge that the technical contributions they claim have not
been previously published or accepted for publication in another
peer-reviewed venue and that no manuscript substantially similar in
content is currently under review. Violations constitute grounds for
For papers that have previously been reviewed by other venues and have
been rejected or withdrawn, the authors are encouraged to provide a
cover letter to describe the history of the paper (however, this does
not imply reviewer continuity). This cover letter can also answer the
comments made in the previous reviews, by either listing the changes
that were made to comply with them or discussing/rebutting/clarifying
some elements if need be. Though not mandatory, this procedure is
strongly encouraged. The cover letter has to be submitted through SRM as
an ‘Additional Attachment’ (see the last section of the SRM upload form
Graphics Replicability Stamp Initiative
Authors who are willing to go one step further toward replicability of
their contributed algorithm and provide a complete open-source
implementation can get additional recognition via submission to the
Graphics Replicability Stamp Initiative (see
<http://www.replicabilitystamp.org/>). All articles published in the
Computer Graphics Forum are eligible to apply for the stamp.
Rebuttal, Notification, Publication, and Prizes
The reviews will be made available to the authors on November 30,
2023. During a rebuttal period from November 30 to December 7, 2023,
authors will be able to submit a brief document to address any
factual errors or clarify any issues raised by reviews.
The date for notification of the results of the first round of the
review process is December 22, 2023.
Revised versions of papers conditionally accepted in the first round
must be submitted by February 1, 2024.
The final notification of the outcome of the second reviewing round
will be made on February 15, 2024.
The camera-ready version of accepted papers will be due on February
From all accepted and presented papers, an international jury will
select the best papers. The best paper will receive the Günter
Enderle Award, including a cash prize of €1,000, presented at
Eurographics 2024 Full Papers Chairs
Amit Haim Bermano, Tel Aviv University
Evangelos Kalogerakis, University of Massachusetts Amherst
For any questions concerning full paper submissions, please do not
hesitate to contact the papers program co-chairs via:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the visionlist