[visionlist] Eurographics 2024 - Call for Papers!

Evangelos Kalogerakis kalo at cs.umass.edu
Tue Aug 1 11:55:04 -04 2023

Call for Full Papers

The EUROGRAPHICS 2024Full Papers Program will showcase innovative 
research in Computer Graphics and related areas. We invite submissions 
of new ideas and encourage all forms of research creativity and 
originality. We are interested in the practice, experience, novel 
applications, technological, system, or theoretical papers, with the 
ambition of setting the standard in the field and stimulating future trends.

Accepted full papers will be presented at EUROGRAPHICS 2024 and 
published in a special issue of the Eurographics journal Computer 
Graphics Forum <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678659>; the 
submissions will undergo a double-blind two-step review process. We 
encourage submissions from all areas related to computer graphics, 
including but not limited to rendering, modeling, animation, simulation, 
AI / deep learning for graphics, image processing, computational 
imaging, computational fabrication, display technology, human-computer 
interaction, virtual and augmented reality.  Eurographics Full Papers 
will be published in the EG Digital Library. Also, Gold Open Access 
be available with an extra publication fee that includes open access fee 
and support through the EG Digital Library.

Eurographics 2024 will be hosted in Limassol, Cyprus on April 22nd-26th, 

At least one author should register and present in-person his or her 
paper. Participants of Eurographics 2024 will be able to attend 
presentations of latest advances in computer graphics and imaging from 
the research and industry experts. It is also going to be a great 
opportunity to meet with international researchers in the domain and 
socialize around the conference social events.

More information on Eurographics 2024 is available at: 
https://eg2024.cyens.org.cy/ <https://eg2024.cyens.org.cy/>


All following deadlines are at 23:59 UTC.


    Sep. 28, 2023: Preliminary abstract due (required for any further


    Oct    5, 2023: Full paper due


    Nov. 30, 2023: Reviews released


    Dec.  7, 2023: Rebuttal due


    Dec. 22, 2023: Notification for conditional acceptance or rejection


    Feb.   1, 2024: Revised version due


    Feb. 15, 2024: Final notification


    Feb. 29, 2024: Camera-ready version

Note that a full paper can only be submitted if an abstract has been 
submitted by the abstract deadline.

    Submission Details

Electronic submission of all papers is mandatory and will be conducted 
using the Submission and Review Management (SRMv2) 
<https://srmv2.eg.org/COMFy/Conference/EG_2024>. Papers must be written 
in English, must be anonymized, and must be formatted according to the 
Eurographics Computer Graphics Forum guidelines. The publication 
guidelines and LaTeX templates are available on SRMv2 
<https://srmv2.eg.org/COMFy/Conference/EG_2024/Instruction>. Accepted 
papers must be presented orally in English at Eurographics 2024. Review 
of full papers is based on a double-blind reviewing approach, so please 
be sure to remove all personal data (such as authors, affiliations, 
etc.) from your submission. References to your own work should be made 
in the third person to maintain anonymity. Reviewers are asked to keep 
confidential all materials sent to them for evaluation.

There is no maximum length imposed on papers. However, papers should 
only be as long as they need to be, but not longer. Reviewers might rank 
submissions perceived as being either repetitive or unnecessarily long 
lower than they would score concisely written papers.

Authors of accepted papers will present a very short summary or a teaser 
during a fast-forward session. This presentation will be around 25 
seconds and can be augmented by slides. To ensure a smooth organization, 
they will be asked to prepare a short video of the slides for this 
purpose, in two versions: one with the spoken text and one without. 
Details will be sent to accepted paper authors.


A submission to the Eurographics Full Papers program should describe the 
original work of the authors. Authors must not use ideas or content 
originating from others without properly crediting their original 
sources. Note that such sources are not limited to peer-reviewed 
publications but also include patents, textbooks, technical reports, 
theses, unpublished work posted on arXiv, and other posts on the World 
Wide Web. Failure to comply with this requirement will be considered 
plagiarism and result in rejection.

    Prior Art

Authors are expected to cite, discuss differences and novelty, and 
compare results, if applicable, with respect to relevant existing 
publications, provided they have been published in a peer-reviewed 
venue. This also applies to patents, which also undergo a professional 
reviewing process. But what about technical reports, and other 
non-peer-reviewed publications, such as technical reports or papers 
posted on arXiv, which we henceforth refer to as pre-publications? With 
the rapid progress of search engines and the increased perusal of arXiv 
papers by the scientific community, asking authors to thoroughly compare 
their work to these pre-publications imposes an unreasonable burden — a 
seemingly relevant report that is incomplete in its disclosure or 
validation might appear online shortly before the deadline. Although 
peer-reviewed publications are certainly not immune to these 
shortcomings, they have, at least, been judged sufficiently complete and 
valid by a group of peers. Consequently, authors are not required to 
discuss and compare their work with recent prepublications (arXiv, 
technical reports, theses, etc.), although they must properly cite those 
that inspired them (see “Plagiarism” above). Nevertheless, we encourage 
authors to mention all related works they are aware of as good academic 
practice dictates. Note that with new works posted on arXiv on a daily 
basis, it is increasingly likely that reviewers might point out 
similarities between the submitted work and online reports that have 
been missed by the authors. In this case, authors of conditionally 
accepted papers should be prepared to cite these pre-publications in 
their final revision as concurrent work, without the burden of having to 
detail how their work compares to or differs from these 
pre-publications. When authors cite previous work that they have 
authored, the citation should be in the third person to preserve 
anonymity. There are, however, situations where such prior work should 
not be cited. This is the case if these prior works correspond to 
prepublications of the submission (arXiv), with largely similar content. 
In this case, it must be ensured that no publicity related to the 
publication is available on the web.

arXiv Policy

As authors, putting a submission on a repository like arXiv is allowed, 
either before submission or during the review cycle. There is no penalty 
for publishing a submission as a prepublication. However, if there are 
largely overlapping prepublications of the same authors that are 
available online at the time of submission (arXiv), earlier or largely 
similar versions of the submission should not be cited in the submission 
because this would identify the authors. This is consistent with the 
submission guidelines at SIGGRAPH and CVPR/ECCV/ICCV. After submission, 
the authors should try to preserve the anonymity of the submission. 
Specifically, the following list clarifies what is allowed and what not.



    arXiv postings before and after the submission deadline. Do not
    state that the submission is under review for Eurographics.


    YouTube video on personal account. Do not show submission id or
    anything that could relate to as a Eurographics submission. Authors
    can link the videos from the arXiv page or personal web page.


    Code release on personal code repositories (e.g., github). Authors
    can link the code repository from the arXiv or personal web page.


    It is ok to list submissions in job applications and in interviews
    as long as they are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.


    It is ok to present the work in non-public venues in particular job
    talks as long as they are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.


    It is ok to list submissions on author’s webpages as long as they
    are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.


    It is ok to publicize the work via authors’ social media as long as
    they are not referred to as Eurographics submissions.

Not allowed:


    It is not allowed to list submissions on institutional websites
    irrespective of the presentation form.


    No publicity via university or company PR teams regardless of
    whether authors or institutions are kept anonymous – this includes
    any postings or dissemination via institutional or promoted social
    media accounts.


    No media interviews regardless of mainstream media or tech-focused
    outlets (small-scale, non-public seminars are allowed).


    Do not post papers or supplementary material on university, company,
    or other private servers that may identify preprints as Eurographics

    Double Submission Policy

By submitting a manuscript to the Eurographics Full Papers program, 
authors acknowledge that the technical contributions they claim have not 
been previously published or accepted for publication in another 
peer-reviewed venue and that no manuscript substantially similar in 
content is currently under review. Violations constitute grounds for 

    Re-Submitted Material

For papers that have previously been reviewed by other venues and have 
been rejected or withdrawn, the authors are encouraged to provide a 
cover letter to describe the history of the paper (however, this does 
not imply reviewer continuity). This cover letter can also answer the 
comments made in the previous reviews, by either listing the changes 
that were made to comply with them or discussing/rebutting/clarifying 
some elements if need be. Though not mandatory, this procedure is 
strongly encouraged. The cover letter has to be submitted through SRM as 
an ‘Additional Attachment’ (see the last section of the SRM upload form 
for details).

    Graphics Replicability Stamp Initiative

Authors who are willing to go one step further toward replicability of 
their contributed algorithm and provide a complete open-source 
implementation can get additional recognition via submission to the 
Graphics Replicability Stamp Initiative (see 
<http://www.replicabilitystamp.org/>). All articles published in the 
Computer Graphics Forum are eligible to apply for the stamp.

    Rebuttal, Notification, Publication, and Prizes


    The reviews will be made available to the authors on November 30,
    2023. During a rebuttal period from November 30 to December 7, 2023,
    authors will be able to submit a brief document to address any
    factual errors or clarify any issues raised by reviews.


    The date for notification of the results of the first round of the
    review process is December 22, 2023.


    Revised versions of papers conditionally accepted in the first round
    must be submitted by February 1, 2024.


    The final notification of the outcome of the second reviewing round
    will be made on February 15, 2024.


    The camera-ready version of accepted papers will be due on February
    29, 2024.


     From all accepted and presented papers, an international jury will
    select the best papers. The best paper will receive the Günter
    Enderle Award, including a cash prize of €1,000, presented at
    Eurographics 2024.

    Eurographics 2024 Full Papers Chairs


    Amit Haim Bermano, Tel Aviv University


    Evangelos Kalogerakis, University of Massachusetts Amherst

For any questions concerning full paper submissions, please do not 
hesitate to contact the papers program co-chairs via: 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://visionscience.com/pipermail/visionlist_visionscience.com/attachments/20230801/b47ad25d/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the visionlist mailing list