[visionlist] LCD Monitors suitable with suitable temporal response

Jim Ferwerda jaf at cis.rit.edu
Wed Mar 1 09:25:18 EST 2017



> On Mar 1, 2017, at 1:21 AM, Martin Vinck <martinvinck at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> How about OLED screens?
> I have been looking into these, and wonder about people's experience with these for vision research.
> I am also curious about noise effects on electrophysiological recordings.

> Best, Martin

I was wondering when this would come up. 

These folks did a nice eval/review a few years back.

Assessment of OLED displays for vision research
Emily A. Cooper <http://jov.arvojournals.org/solr/searchresults.aspx?author=Emily+A.+Cooper>; Haomiao Jiang <http://jov.arvojournals.org/solr/searchresults.aspx?author=Haomiao+Jiang>; Vladimir Vildavski <http://jov.arvojournals.org/solr/searchresults.aspx?author=Vladimir+Vildavski>; Joyce E. Farrell <http://jov.arvojournals.org/solr/searchresults.aspx?author=Joyce+E.+Farrell>; Anthony M. Norcia <http://jov.arvojournals.org/solr/searchresults.aspx?author=Anthony+M.+Norcia>

http://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2121369 <http://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2121369>

Also, see this paper on temporal/motion issues.

Johnson, P., Kim, J., Hoffman, D. M., Vargas, A. and Banks, M. S. (2014), 55.1: Distinguished Paper: Motion Artifacts on 240Hz OLED Stereoscopic 3D Displays. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers, 45: 797–800. doi:10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00209.x

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00209.x/full <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00209.x/full>

Phillip, Since you’re at Berkeley I was going to suggest that you talk with Marty Banks but I see that you already work together. Are there specific issues re: time/motion that you’re concerned about that aren’t addressed in these papers or are you just polling the community for broader info?

-Jim Ferwerda

> 
> 
> 
> On 28 Feb 2017, at 23:55, Phillip Guan <philguan at berkeley.edu <mailto:philguan at berkeley.edu>> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I'm wondering if there are alternatives to CRTs and the ViewPixx3D ($12,000 each) displays that can be used when fast response times are required for temporally varying stimuli. From this paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369646/ <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369646/> it seems that certain gaming monitors may be approaching the required quality level, are there any specific high framerate gaming panels that have come out in the last two years that approach parity with CRTs? 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Phillip Guan
>> _______________________________________________
>> visionlist mailing list
>> visionlist at visionscience.com <mailto:visionlist at visionscience.com>
>> http://visionscience.com/mailman/listinfo/visionlist_visionscience.com <http://visionscience.com/mailman/listinfo/visionlist_visionscience.com>
> _______________________________________________
> visionlist mailing list
> visionlist at visionscience.com
> http://visionscience.com/mailman/listinfo/visionlist_visionscience.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://visionscience.com/pipermail/visionlist_visionscience.com/attachments/20170301/aca2f6dc/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the visionlist mailing list