[visionlist] Highly cited publications on vision in which authors were also subjects?

[Gabriel Diaz]

Hello again, fellow vision scientists!

I would like to thank you all again for your participation in this email
thread, and the citations you have very graciously provided.  For your
convenience, here is a google doc that includes *most* of the contributions
I have received from the group.
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bo3_Pwm9ayK7VMoevB7X3mNInlZ4ke9WbLTKyQrhG-o/edit?usp=sharing>
I have kept contributions in the format in which they were submitted.  Only
a few were left out because they were not vision, and a few more because a
proper citation was not provided.

Some have asked for more information about my request.  This request was
motivated by the need to convince my IRB that it is a common practice in
vision and psychophysics for the PI to also act as a participant in a study
of her or his own design.  Thanks to your help, I can make this
*abundantly *clear. Why did they need to be convinced?  To be quite frank,
I'm not sure. They were unusually non-specific, even when I sought more
information. To their defense, I have not had a negative interaction with
my usually IRB in the six years at my home institution, and until this
point have considered them to be very-cooperative and reasonable.  What has
changed?  I can only speculate, but I fear that the roadblocks in place may
have come from up-above, and may be somehow related to the unusual
circumstances surrounding COVID19. It is an ongoing discussion.

Thank you all,
- gD


On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 9:51 AM Gabriel Diaz <gabriel.jacob.diaz at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear vision community,
>
> In response to a recent proposal to my IRB, I have received a request to
> provide examples of manuscripts in which the PI is also the subject in the
> manuscript.  I am hoping that some of you may be able to help me track some
> down. The more impactful the better, whether that be indicated by citation
> count, recognition of the publication venue, or any other metric, as long
> as it will be evident to a non-expert.
>
> Extra points if the study involves some element of motor behavior /
> perception & action.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> - gD
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://visionscience.com/pipermail/visionlist_visionscience.com/attachments/20200612/2d889488/attachment.html>